Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:37

What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What's your favorite stupid joke?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What is the reason for the high rate of unmarried individuals in America, particularly among males?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
SpaceX launch from California sends 26 Starlink satellites into low Earth orbit - Space
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
‘We’re right at the epicenter’ - Meduza
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
How I Turned My Fitness Around with an Infrared Sauna Blanket?
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Walmart Nintendo Switch 2: it was in stock and will be back next week - The Shortcut | Matt Swider
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?